Please do not text and drive
As baseball season gets underway, fan enthusiasm is already on full display. A recent report by CTV News highlighted that the Ottawa Titans sold out their 2026 home opener—an exciting sign that stadiums will be packed once again. With that excitement, however, comes an important legal question: what happens when someone gets injured at a baseball game, and who is responsible?
For Ottawa personal injury lawyers, stadium injury claims involve a careful analysis of negligence, occupiers’ liability, and the concept of assumed risk. While some risks are considered part of the game, others may give rise to valid legal claims depending on the circumstances.
Courts recognize that spectators attending sporting events accept certain inherent risks. This concept is often referred to as voluntary assumption of risk or volenti non fit injuria. Meaning that fans understand and accept dangers that are obvious and integral to the sport.
Canada does not formally apply a single “Baseball Rule,” but the underlying principle is similar. Stadium operators are expected to take reasonable precautions. However, they are not required to eliminate all risks associated with the game.
A helpful illustration comes from a British Columbia case in which a spectator was struck by a foul ball at a youth baseball park. In that case, the court ultimately found no liability against any defendant. The court emphasized that foul balls leaving the field are a normal and expected part of baseball, and that spectators must remain aware of that risk.
In Canada, liability for injuries at a baseball game is often governed by provincial occupiers’ liability legislation, such as Ontario’s Occupiers’ Liability Act. Under this framework, stadium owners and operators (the “occupiers”) owe a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that visitors are safe while on the premises.
Importantly, this duty is one of reasonableness, not perfection. As the British Columbia decision above confirms, stadium operators are not required to eliminate every conceivable risk—only to ensure that conditions meet accepted safety standards.
In Ottawa ballparks and sports venues, liability may still arise where injuries stem from hazards unrelated to the game itself, such as:
If an occupier knew—or should have known—about a dangerous condition and failed to address it, they may be held liable.
In many stadium injury cases, responsibility may extend beyond the stadium owner. Third-party vendors, maintenance contractors, or security companies can also be liable if their negligence contributes to an injury.
For example, a vendor who leaves equipment in a walkway may create a tripping hazard, while a security provider that fails to respond to escalating behaviour could share responsibility for resulting harm. In Ottawa personal injury claims, determining liability in these situations often requires a details, fact-specific investigation.
Professional baseball players are generally not liable for injuries caused during the normal course of play. Hitting a foul ball into the stands, for example, is an inherent and unavoidable aspect of baseball.
However, players may be liable if their actions go beyond what is reasonably expected in the sport. This could include:
In these cases, courts will assess whether the player’s conduct fell below the expected standard of care.
When players themselves are injured, different legal principles often apply. Many claims are governed by employment contracts, insurance schemes, and league agreements rather than traditional negligence law.
That said, players may still pursue claims against third parties. For example, if unsafe field conditions or poorly maintained facilities contribute to an injury, the stadium operator could be held liable. Recent cases in professional sports have shown that even athletes may bring negligence claims when hazards go beyond the inherent risks of the game.
Canadian law takes a balanced approach to stadium injuries. Key considerations include:
As the British Columbia case demonstrates, not every injury will result in liability. Courts recognize that accidents can occur even where reasonable precautions are in place.
As stadiums across Ottawa and Eastern Ontario fill with fans eager to enjoy the new baseball season, injuries—while relatively uncommon—remain a possibility. The law reflects this reality by distinguishing between unavoidable risks and preventable harm.
While spectators accept certain dangers as part of the game, they are still entitled to reasonably safe conditions. Where negligence plays a role—whether by a stadium operator, third party, or even a player—legal liability may follow.
KINGSTON | OTTAWA | PERTH | CARLETON PLACE | PEMBROKE
Consistently ranked as a Top 10 Injury Law Firm by Canadian Lawyer Magazine.
SOCIAL MEDIA:
ALMONTE | AJAX | AMHERSTVIEW | ARNPRIOR | ATHENS | BANCROFT | BELLEVILLE | BOWMANVILLE | BROCKVILLE | CARLETON PLACE | COBDEN | COBOURG | CORNWALL | CARDINAL | DURHAM | ELGIN | HASTINGS | HAWKESBURY | IROQUOIS | KANATA | KEMPTVILLE | KAWARTHA LAKES | KINGSTON | LINDSAY | MORRISBURG | NAPANEE | NEPEAN | NORTHUMBERLAND | NUNAVUT | ORLEANS | OTTAWA | PEMBROKE | PERTH| PETERBOROUGH | PICKERING | PICTON | PORT HOPE | PRESCOTT | RENFREW | SMITHS FALLS | STITTSVILLE | TRENTON | WHITBY
ALMONTE | AJAX | AMHERSTVIEW | ARNPRIOR | ATHENS | BANCROFT | BELLEVILLE | BOWMANVILLE | BROCKVILLE | CARLETON PLACE | COBDEN | COBOURG | CORNWALL | CARDINAL | DURHAM | ELGIN | HASTINGS | HAWKESBURY | IROQUOIS | KANATA | KEMPTVILLE | KAWARTHA LAKES | KINGSTON | LINDSAY | MORRISBURG | NAPANEE | NEPEAN | NORTHUMBERLAND | NUNAVUT | ORLEANS | OTTAWA | PEMBROKE | PERTH| PETERBOROUGH | PICKERING | PICTON | PORT HOPE | PRESCOTT | RENFREW | SMITHS FALLS | STITTSVILLE | TRENTON | WHITBY