Please do not text and drive
Self-driving cars and AI-powered vehicle features are no longer science fiction. From adaptive cruise control to lane-keeping assistance self-driving vehicles, artificial intelligence is already making decisions on our roads. But when a self-driving car accident happens, many injury victims are left asking an important question:
Can I sue if AI or self-driving technology caused the accident?
The answer is yes — but AI vehicle accident claims and autonomous vehicle accident law suits are far more complex than traditional motor vehicle collision claims.
Most vehicles on the road today are not fully autonomous, but many include AI-driven driving systems and automated vehicle technology such as:
Automatic Emergency Brakes
Lane Departure Warnings
Blind Spot Detection
Traffic-Aware Cruise Control
Parking Assistance
Supervised Self-Driving Features
While these AI-assisted driving systems and autonomous vehicle technologies are designed to improve safety, they can still fail, misinterpret data, or malfunction, leading to serious self-driving accidents that could case serious injuries.
The Ontario Ministry of Transportation has been trialing a pilot program since 2016, the Automated Vehicle Pilot Program. Within the rules of this program, it is mandated that there must always be a driver seated in the driver’s seat, ready and present in the event they need to take over in self-driving vehicles and AI-assisted driving technology in Ontario.
Further to this, encoded in the Highway Traffic Act (HTA) is Ontario Regulation 306/15 which speaks to the rules of the road, concerning this pilot program and liability following a self-driving car accident. Section 1 (3) of this Regulation notes that a person seated in the driver’s seat of an automated vehicle is considered to be the driver of that vehicle, regardless of the automated driving system or AI technology being engaged.
Section 2.1 (1) of the Regulation discusses the apportionment of liability, which coincides with the current rules of the road under the HTA and applies to AI-related motor vehicle accidents. Although this Act may not directly apply to self-driving vehicles who aren’t participating in the Pilot Program, this Regulation seems to be foreshadowing how Ontario will approach future AI car accident claims.
Furthermore, to ensure there is sufficient insurance coverage, it is a requirement that all vehicles driving under this program must also have at minimum:
What is important to take away from this Regulation is that when a self-driving vehicle crashes, currently, the same rules of the road apply to autonomous and AI-assisted vehicles. The same duty of care and principles of negligence will apply when assessing fault and determining liability in AI and self-driving car accidents. Ontario’s HTA is still the governing legislation, and as such, the current rules prevail.
Unlike traditional car crashes where fault usually falls on one driver, AI-related accidents may involve multiple liable parties, including:
1. The Vehicle Manufacturer
If the AI system was defectively designed or improperly tested, the manufacturer may be liable under product liability laws for AI and autonomous vehicle accidents.
2. Software Developers
Some accidents stem from software errors, delayed updates, or faulty algorithms. In those cases, the company that designed or maintained the AI driving software may share responsibility.
3. Parts or Sensor Manufacturers
Self-driving features rely on cameras, radar, lidar, and sensors. If one of these components fails, the manufacturer of that part could be held accountable in a self-driving car accident claim.
4. The Human Driver
Even with advanced automation, drivers are often still required to remain alert and intervene when necessary when using AI-assisted driving systems.
5. The Vehicle Owner
Even if the owner of the self-driving vehicle isn’t the one in the passenger seat, they may still be liable through the doctrine of vicarious liability in an AI-related motor vehicle accident.
Although the rules around liability may change alongside the advancements in self-driving and autonomous vehicle technology, for now, operators of self-driving vehicles are expected to follow the rules of the road, intervene if necessary, and may be held responsible for the damages that result therefrom following an AI or self-driving car accident.
AI-related injury cases are legally challenging because AI car accident claims and self-driving vehicle accident cases often involve:
Insurance companies may try to deny AI-related accident claims by arguing that:
Without legal representation, victims of AI and self-driving car accidents often struggle to access critical evidence or prove how the AI driving system or autonomous vehicle technology failed.
These AI car accident and self-driving vehicle accident cases are extremely evidence sensitive. Important proof may include:
Many of these records are automatically overwritten or deleted within weeks, sometimes days after a crash involving AI or self-driving technology. Acting quickly is essential to preserve evidence in an AI accident claim.
If you believe AI or self-driving technology played a role in your car accident, you should take the following steps:
Early legal involvement can mean the difference between a denied claim and full compensation after an AI or self-driving car accident.
Yes. Victims of AI-related accidents and self-driving vehicle accidents may be entitled to compensation through an AI accident claim or lawsuit for:
As AI autonomous vehicle technology continues to evolve, so does the law surrounding it. Accidents involving self-driving or AI-assisted vehicles are becoming more common and insurance companies are already adapting their defenses in AI car accident claims.
If you’ve been injured in an accident involving AI or autonomous vehicle technology, don’t assume you don’t have a case. These AI-related claims are complex, time-sensitive, and often involve powerful corporate interests.
Speaking with an experienced personal injury lawyer early can help protect your rights and preserve the evidence needed to hold the responsible parties accountable after an AI or self-driving car accident.
Contact Bergeron Clifford LLP today.
KINGSTON | OTTAWA | PERTH | CARLETON PLACE | PEMBROKE
Consistently ranked as a Top 10 Injury Law Firm by Canadian Lawyer Magazine.
SOCIAL MEDIA:
ALMONTE | AJAX | AMHERSTVIEW | ARNPRIOR | ATHENS | BANCROFT | BELLEVILLE | BOWMANVILLE | BROCKVILLE | CARLETON PLACE | COBDEN | COBOURG | CORNWALL | CARDINAL | DURHAM | ELGIN | HASTINGS | HAWKESBURY | IROQUOIS | KANATA | KEMPTVILLE | KAWARTHA LAKES | KINGSTON | LINDSAY | MORRISBURG | NAPANEE | NEPEAN | NORTHUMBERLAND | NUNAVUT | ORLEANS | OTTAWA | PEMBROKE | PERTH| PETERBOROUGH | PICKERING | PICTON | PORT HOPE | PRESCOTT | RENFREW | SMITHS FALLS | STITTSVILLE | TRENTON | WHITBY
ALMONTE | AJAX | AMHERSTVIEW | ARNPRIOR | ATHENS | BANCROFT | BELLEVILLE | BOWMANVILLE | BROCKVILLE | CARLETON PLACE | COBDEN | COBOURG | CORNWALL | CARDINAL | DURHAM | ELGIN | HASTINGS | HAWKESBURY | IROQUOIS | KANATA | KEMPTVILLE | KAWARTHA LAKES | KINGSTON | LINDSAY | MORRISBURG | NAPANEE | NEPEAN | NORTHUMBERLAND | NUNAVUT | ORLEANS | OTTAWA | PEMBROKE | PERTH| PETERBOROUGH | PICKERING | PICTON | PORT HOPE | PRESCOTT | RENFREW | SMITHS FALLS | STITTSVILLE | TRENTON | WHITBY